Poster evaluation – Smart Agriculture

SASCP CONGRESS

EVALUATION OF POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Evaluate presentation in the following categories:

Session

Candidate

Title of paper

Marks allocated
Poor = 1Fair = 1,1 – 2Average = 2,1 – 3 Good = 3,1 – 4 Excellent = 4,1 – 5

Poster presentation: Style and general layout

1.1 Colour combination of text and back ground

1.2 Font type and consistent use of font (on different slides)

1.3 Layout components (lines, bullets, photos)

1.4 Use of tables, graphs and photos

1.5 Spelling and grammar

1.6 Appropriate relevant information (too much/not enough)

1.7 Business of poster

Knowledge of subject

2.1 Clear about the topic and content

2.2 Clear introduction, motivation, hypothesis, and objectives (If it’s a research work)

2.3 Interpretation of results and conclusions

2.4 Application value and impact of the study

2.5 Scientific approach and design (treatments, layout, size of trial, repetitions, data collection, statistics)

Comments

Name of evaluator